The Iran war exposed Trump's economic weaknesses, and the Taiwan Strait blockade led to a surge in domestic pressure in the United States.
2026-04-20 11:14:45
Seven weeks into the conflict in Iran, the government failed to overthrow the Iranian regime or force Iran to fully accept all of President Trump's conditions. However, the war clearly exposed a core weakness of Trump's administration: its limited capacity to withstand domestic economic pressure.
The dramatic turmoil in the Middle East has not only led both allies and adversaries to question the reliability of the United States, but also carries the potential for long-term economic and geopolitical consequences. America's competitors are observing and learning lessons about the bottom lines of U.S. decision-making.
On February 28, Trump, citing an imminent security threat posed by Iran's nuclear program, launched a joint military operation with Israel against Iran. However, rising gasoline prices, increased inflationary pressures, and declining approval ratings are now forcing him to actively seek diplomatic agreements to mitigate the negative domestic impact.
Analysts point out that although Iran has suffered heavy military damage, the country has caused a more severe impact on the global energy market than Trump and his team anticipated by controlling the Strait of Hormuz and other means, triggering the most severe global energy crisis in recent years.
Trump has repeatedly downplayed the negative impact of the war on the US economy, but he cannot ignore the real pressure that soaring energy costs are putting on ordinary consumers. Although the US itself is relatively less dependent on one-fifth of the world's oil supply transported through the Strait of Hormuz, the overall rise in international energy prices has still severely damaged the US economy.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has also warned that the risk of a global economic recession is rising, which further exacerbates the predicament facing Trump.
Domestic political pressure to end the unpopular war as Republicans struggle to maintain a slim majority in Congress during the November midterm elections is mounting. Iranian leaders are well aware of this, and they are leveraging their control of the Strait of Hormuz to force the Trump team back to the negotiating table.
"Trump is feeling intense economic pressure, which is his Achilles' heel in this war," said Brett Bruen, a former foreign policy advisor in the Obama administration and now head of the strategic consulting firm Global Situation Room.
Trump's abrupt shift from large-scale airstrikes to diplomatic efforts on April 8 was primarily driven by pressure from financial market volatility and some "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) supporters. American farmers, a key support base for Trump, suffered economic losses due to disruptions in fertilizer shipments; meanwhile, soaring jet fuel prices led to higher airfares, further amplifying domestic discontent.
With the two-week ceasefire period fast approaching, it remains uncertain whether the president, known for his unpredictability, will reach an agreement that aligns with his war objectives, extending the ceasefire beyond April 21, or choose to resume military operations.
Analysts believe that Trump seems to have underestimated Iran's potential economic retaliation in an armed conflict, including attacks on Gulf states' energy infrastructure and blockades of key strategic waterways. U.S. officials have privately admitted that Trump initially thought the war would be a controlled, limited military operation, similar to the swift action against Venezuela on January 3 and the June strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, but the actual consequences have been far more profound than anticipated.
Experts warn that even if the war ends quickly, the damage to the US and global economies could take months or even years to repair. This conflict could also send a clear signal to Asian allies such as Japan and South Korea: while Trump may want to improve relations with major Asian powers, he may not prioritize the geopolitical and economic security interests of these allies in pursuing his own regional goals. Given concerns about Trump's reliability, these governments are strengthening their preparedness for various contingencies.
The evolution of the Iran war has fully exposed Trump's vulnerability in the face of economic pressure. Control of the Strait of Hormuz has become a crucial bargaining chip in Iran's hands, forcing Trump to weigh military objectives against domestic economic stability. This not only tests Trump's decision-making ability in his second term but also forces the international community to re-examine the role of the United States in global energy security and the geopolitical landscape.
The future trajectory will depend on whether Trump can find a balance between domestic pressure and international goals, a balance that is becoming increasingly difficult to achieve.
The dramatic turmoil in the Middle East has not only led both allies and adversaries to question the reliability of the United States, but also carries the potential for long-term economic and geopolitical consequences. America's competitors are observing and learning lessons about the bottom lines of U.S. decision-making.
The Middle East crisis directly impacts Trump's domestic economic bottom line.
On February 28, Trump, citing an imminent security threat posed by Iran's nuclear program, launched a joint military operation with Israel against Iran. However, rising gasoline prices, increased inflationary pressures, and declining approval ratings are now forcing him to actively seek diplomatic agreements to mitigate the negative domestic impact.
Analysts point out that although Iran has suffered heavy military damage, the country has caused a more severe impact on the global energy market than Trump and his team anticipated by controlling the Strait of Hormuz and other means, triggering the most severe global energy crisis in recent years.
Trump has repeatedly downplayed the negative impact of the war on the US economy, but he cannot ignore the real pressure that soaring energy costs are putting on ordinary consumers. Although the US itself is relatively less dependent on one-fifth of the world's oil supply transported through the Strait of Hormuz, the overall rise in international energy prices has still severely damaged the US economy.
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has also warned that the risk of a global economic recession is rising, which further exacerbates the predicament facing Trump.
Domestic political pressure to end the unpopular war as Republicans struggle to maintain a slim majority in Congress during the November midterm elections is mounting. Iranian leaders are well aware of this, and they are leveraging their control of the Strait of Hormuz to force the Trump team back to the negotiating table.
Trump's Achilles' heel has been laid bare.
"Trump is feeling intense economic pressure, which is his Achilles' heel in this war," said Brett Bruen, a former foreign policy advisor in the Obama administration and now head of the strategic consulting firm Global Situation Room.
Trump's abrupt shift from large-scale airstrikes to diplomatic efforts on April 8 was primarily driven by pressure from financial market volatility and some "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) supporters. American farmers, a key support base for Trump, suffered economic losses due to disruptions in fertilizer shipments; meanwhile, soaring jet fuel prices led to higher airfares, further amplifying domestic discontent.
With the two-week ceasefire period fast approaching, it remains uncertain whether the president, known for his unpredictability, will reach an agreement that aligns with his war objectives, extending the ceasefire beyond April 21, or choose to resume military operations.
Misjudging Iran's economic retaliatory capabilities could have long-lasting consequences.
Analysts believe that Trump seems to have underestimated Iran's potential economic retaliation in an armed conflict, including attacks on Gulf states' energy infrastructure and blockades of key strategic waterways. U.S. officials have privately admitted that Trump initially thought the war would be a controlled, limited military operation, similar to the swift action against Venezuela on January 3 and the June strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, but the actual consequences have been far more profound than anticipated.
Experts warn that even if the war ends quickly, the damage to the US and global economies could take months or even years to repair. This conflict could also send a clear signal to Asian allies such as Japan and South Korea: while Trump may want to improve relations with major Asian powers, he may not prioritize the geopolitical and economic security interests of these allies in pursuing his own regional goals. Given concerns about Trump's reliability, these governments are strengthening their preparedness for various contingencies.
Summarize
The evolution of the Iran war has fully exposed Trump's vulnerability in the face of economic pressure. Control of the Strait of Hormuz has become a crucial bargaining chip in Iran's hands, forcing Trump to weigh military objectives against domestic economic stability. This not only tests Trump's decision-making ability in his second term but also forces the international community to re-examine the role of the United States in global energy security and the geopolitical landscape.
The future trajectory will depend on whether Trump can find a balance between domestic pressure and international goals, a balance that is becoming increasingly difficult to achieve.
- Risk Warning and Disclaimer
- The market involves risk, and trading may not be suitable for all investors. This article is for reference only and does not constitute personal investment advice, nor does it take into account certain users’ specific investment objectives, financial situation, or other needs. Any investment decisions made based on this information are at your own risk.
