Will Brent crude oil return to $100 a barrel?
2026-08-18 19:36:57
The ongoing escalation of global geopolitical frictions and the continued tightening of the international crude oil market supply have combined to significantly increase the probability of Brent crude oil prices breaking through the key $100 per barrel mark. At the same time, the strong performance of the crude oil market has indirectly boosted the US dollar index, reshaping the linkage between the commodity and foreign exchange markets. 
The escalating conflict in the Middle East has completely shattered the long-standing trading range of international oil prices, pushing Brent crude oil prices out of the narrow fluctuation range of $80 to $90. Simultaneously, global commercial and strategic crude oil inventories continue to decline rapidly, and the current low inventory levels have further exacerbated market supply anxieties, significantly increasing the risk and possibility of Brent crude oil stabilizing and breaking through $100 per barrel. Driven by the complex and volatile geopolitical situation, dollar assets have once again become the core target for capital safe-haven investment and speculation. The 60-day temporary ceasefire agreement previously reached between the United States and Iran has officially expired, with the US clearly stating that it will not renew the agreement, and the regional situation has once again lost its basis for checks and balances. Iran, on the other hand, has publicly signaled a strong stance on escalating the conflict and seized a commercial oil tanker in the Strait of Hormuz, a key global oil shipping route, directly disrupting oil transportation. Meanwhile, the Houthi rebels, influenced by Iranian power, have continued to increase the frequency and intensity of attacks on oil transportation facilities and oil and gas infrastructure along the Red Sea. A series of overlapping geopolitical risks directly pushed Brent crude oil prices up rapidly to around $92 per barrel, fueling market expectations of a tightening monetary policy by the Federal Reserve. This, in turn, led to a simultaneous rise in the US dollar index, creating a synergistic effect of rising oil prices and a stronger dollar. In June and July of this year, US inflation data steadily declined, primarily due to a brief easing of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and a general decline in global energy prices, effectively alleviating domestic inflationary pressures in the US. At that time, market sentiment leaned towards easing, and the probability of the Federal Reserve implementing monetary tightening in September once fell to 34%, while the market's prediction of a Fed rate hike before the end of 2026 also fell to 64%. However, with the resurgence of tensions in the Middle East, Iran's seizure of an oil tanker in the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with Trump's public hardline statements threatening military action against Oman if it continues to cooperate in obstructing US maritime blockade operations, market risk aversion and inflation concerns quickly rebounded. The probability of the Federal Reserve implementing monetary tightening this year rose again to 70%, providing solid policy expectation support for the subsequent strengthening of the US dollar. Despite the escalating geopolitical risks in the Middle East and the accumulation of positive market factors, the rise in Brent crude oil prices has been relatively gradual, failing to meet the aggressive expectations of most investors. At the outset of the Middle East conflict, bullish sentiment was high, with many institutions and investors predicting a surge in North Sea Brent crude oil prices, potentially reaching $150 per barrel. However, in reality, the bulls only achieved a small increase, far below market expectations. The core reason for the lackluster price increase lies in the resilience of the actual crude oil transport capacity through the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with the existence of hidden shadow crude oil supply as a safety net. Although the crude oil transport capacity of the core transport corridor has declined significantly, the precipitous drop predicted by the market's initial panic has not occurred, effectively offsetting the price increases brought about by geopolitical risks. Data from energy data analysis firm Kpler shows that the daily crude oil transit volume through the Strait of Hormuz has plummeted from 18 million barrels before the conflict to 4.9 million barrels, a significant reduction in transport capacity. However, industry insiders revealed that the actual volume of crude oil transportation through the Strait of Hormuz is far higher than publicly available statistics, and the actual market supply is not as tight as the data suggests. Subsequent official data released by the U.S. Department of Energy also confirmed this view, with the current daily crude oil transportation volume through the Strait remaining at around 9 million barrels. The core reason for the data discrepancy is the large-scale deployment of "shadow tankers" circumventing sanctions, along with numerous shipping companies utilizing alternative sea routes, effectively compensating for the capacity gap in the main channel. Kepler further calculated that the overall daily crude oil exports from the Middle East have fallen from 21 million barrels before the war to 9.5 million barrels, a nearly 50% reduction in regional export capacity. Market sentiment is undergoing a fundamental shift, with investors gradually abandoning the preconceived notion that "supply disruptions are short-term shocks" and beginning to accept the core logic that geopolitical conflicts are becoming the norm and that a persistently tight crude oil supply will become the new normal in the energy market. In addition, the continued decline in U.S. strategic petroleum reserves has also provided strong support for Brent crude oil prices. The U.S. strategic petroleum reserves have now fallen to their lowest level since 1982, with a single-week inventory decline of 5.3 million barrels. The U.S. strategic oil security buffer continues to shrink, and the market's tolerance for supply disruptions has significantly decreased. If further geopolitical disturbances or production cuts occur, oil prices are highly likely to surge, with the risk of breaking through $100 per barrel accumulating and rising.
The escalating conflict in the Middle East has completely shattered the long-standing trading range of international oil prices, pushing Brent crude oil prices out of the narrow fluctuation range of $80 to $90. Simultaneously, global commercial and strategic crude oil inventories continue to decline rapidly, and the current low inventory levels have further exacerbated market supply anxieties, significantly increasing the risk and possibility of Brent crude oil stabilizing and breaking through $100 per barrel. Driven by the complex and volatile geopolitical situation, dollar assets have once again become the core target for capital safe-haven investment and speculation. The 60-day temporary ceasefire agreement previously reached between the United States and Iran has officially expired, with the US clearly stating that it will not renew the agreement, and the regional situation has once again lost its basis for checks and balances. Iran, on the other hand, has publicly signaled a strong stance on escalating the conflict and seized a commercial oil tanker in the Strait of Hormuz, a key global oil shipping route, directly disrupting oil transportation. Meanwhile, the Houthi rebels, influenced by Iranian power, have continued to increase the frequency and intensity of attacks on oil transportation facilities and oil and gas infrastructure along the Red Sea. A series of overlapping geopolitical risks directly pushed Brent crude oil prices up rapidly to around $92 per barrel, fueling market expectations of a tightening monetary policy by the Federal Reserve. This, in turn, led to a simultaneous rise in the US dollar index, creating a synergistic effect of rising oil prices and a stronger dollar. In June and July of this year, US inflation data steadily declined, primarily due to a brief easing of geopolitical tensions in the Middle East and a general decline in global energy prices, effectively alleviating domestic inflationary pressures in the US. At that time, market sentiment leaned towards easing, and the probability of the Federal Reserve implementing monetary tightening in September once fell to 34%, while the market's prediction of a Fed rate hike before the end of 2026 also fell to 64%. However, with the resurgence of tensions in the Middle East, Iran's seizure of an oil tanker in the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with Trump's public hardline statements threatening military action against Oman if it continues to cooperate in obstructing US maritime blockade operations, market risk aversion and inflation concerns quickly rebounded. The probability of the Federal Reserve implementing monetary tightening this year rose again to 70%, providing solid policy expectation support for the subsequent strengthening of the US dollar. Despite the escalating geopolitical risks in the Middle East and the accumulation of positive market factors, the rise in Brent crude oil prices has been relatively gradual, failing to meet the aggressive expectations of most investors. At the outset of the Middle East conflict, bullish sentiment was high, with many institutions and investors predicting a surge in North Sea Brent crude oil prices, potentially reaching $150 per barrel. However, in reality, the bulls only achieved a small increase, far below market expectations. The core reason for the lackluster price increase lies in the resilience of the actual crude oil transport capacity through the Strait of Hormuz, coupled with the existence of hidden shadow crude oil supply as a safety net. Although the crude oil transport capacity of the core transport corridor has declined significantly, the precipitous drop predicted by the market's initial panic has not occurred, effectively offsetting the price increases brought about by geopolitical risks. Data from energy data analysis firm Kpler shows that the daily crude oil transit volume through the Strait of Hormuz has plummeted from 18 million barrels before the conflict to 4.9 million barrels, a significant reduction in transport capacity. However, industry insiders revealed that the actual volume of crude oil transportation through the Strait of Hormuz is far higher than publicly available statistics, and the actual market supply is not as tight as the data suggests. Subsequent official data released by the U.S. Department of Energy also confirmed this view, with the current daily crude oil transportation volume through the Strait remaining at around 9 million barrels. The core reason for the data discrepancy is the large-scale deployment of "shadow tankers" circumventing sanctions, along with numerous shipping companies utilizing alternative sea routes, effectively compensating for the capacity gap in the main channel. Kepler further calculated that the overall daily crude oil exports from the Middle East have fallen from 21 million barrels before the war to 9.5 million barrels, a nearly 50% reduction in regional export capacity. Market sentiment is undergoing a fundamental shift, with investors gradually abandoning the preconceived notion that "supply disruptions are short-term shocks" and beginning to accept the core logic that geopolitical conflicts are becoming the norm and that a persistently tight crude oil supply will become the new normal in the energy market. In addition, the continued decline in U.S. strategic petroleum reserves has also provided strong support for Brent crude oil prices. The U.S. strategic petroleum reserves have now fallen to their lowest level since 1982, with a single-week inventory decline of 5.3 million barrels. The U.S. strategic oil security buffer continues to shrink, and the market's tolerance for supply disruptions has significantly decreased. If further geopolitical disturbances or production cuts occur, oil prices are highly likely to surge, with the risk of breaking through $100 per barrel accumulating and rising.
- Risk Warning and Disclaimer
- The market involves risk, and trading may not be suitable for all investors. This article is for reference only and does not constitute personal investment advice, nor does it take into account certain users’ specific investment objectives, financial situation, or other needs. Any investment decisions made based on this information are at your own risk.
