Download App

[Trump's Tariff Policy Faces Constitutional Challenges, Supreme Court Questions "Imperial Presidential Power"] 1. The U.S. Supreme Court recently engaged in heated debate over the legality of Trump's tariff policy. Its ruling will directly impact tariff revenues of up to $90 billion and may reshape the power structure of the U.S. separation of powers. During Wednesday's hearing, Attorney General John Saul unexpectedly claimed that "tariffs are not intended to increase fiscal revenue," a statement that contrasts sharply with Trump's years-long public advocacy of tariffs' revenue-generating effect. The Constitution clearly stipulates that the power to tax belongs to Congress, while the Trump administration invoked the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose tariffs of up to 100% on almost all countries, sparking controversy over overstepping its authority. 2. Chief Justice Roberts questioned in court, "Trump is using the power to impose tariffs of any amount on any product from any country, which certainly appears to be a significant power." Justice Kagan went even further, pointing to the core issue: "A tax without limits, which can be levied at will, raises serious authorization problems." 3. The trial revealed that at least six of the nine justices leaned towards rejecting Trump's tariff authorization, including three liberal justices and three conservative justices: Roberts, Gorsuch, and Barrett. Justice Gorsuch warned that the case was essentially a "one-way ratchet," causing power to continuously flow from elected representatives to the executive branch. 4. If the Supreme Court ultimately rejects Trump's tariff authorization, it will not only impact his fiscal revenue plans but also curb the expansion of "imperial presidential power." Although Trump claimed the ruling would "completely destroy America," analysts pointed out that he could still reinstate some tariffs under other legal authorizations. This case is essentially a battle to defend constitutional order, and its ruling will define crucial boundaries for presidential power.