Missiles roar, alarms sound: Israel and Iran clash in full force, Trump's ceasefire agreement in jeopardy.
2026-06-08 14:25:02
The new week saw a sudden and renewed surge in tensions in the Middle East. Direct military clashes between Israel and Iran continued from early Monday morning (June 8th) Beijing time until Monday afternoon, with both sides exchanging missile strikes and airstrikes against targets within each other's territories, completely shattering the fragile ceasefire agreement painstakingly brokered by US President Trump since early April. This escalation of violence not only tests the US-led peace framework but also reignites international concerns about a full-blown regional war.
Since the ceasefire agreement took effect, although there have been several low-intensity skirmishes between Iran and Israel, both sides have consistently avoided directly attacking each other's territory. However, this attack and retaliation marks a formal breach of the previously maintained "red line of restraint" between the two countries. According to various sources, the trigger for this round of fighting can be traced back to an Israeli airstrike on Beirut, the capital of Lebanon—the Israeli military claimed it struck a command center of Hezbollah, a Lebanese party supported by Iran. Hezbollah subsequently launched rockets into northern Israel, which were intercepted by the Israeli military, but Iran immediately responded strongly, launching multiple waves of missiles into Israel.
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps publicly claimed responsibility for its missile strikes on an airbase in southern Israel. Simultaneously, air raid sirens sounded across Israel, and the military confirmed that Iran had launched multiple waves of new missiles. Further complicating matters, Israel also intercepted a ballistic missile launched from Yemen, believed to have been fired by the Houthi rebels—an Iranian-backed group that controls much of Yemen and is designated a terrorist organization by the United States.
U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee described the tense scene on social media: Explosions could be clearly heard over Tel Aviv as Israel scrambled to intercept incoming missiles. Fortunately, neither the attack from Yemen nor the initial Iranian strikes resulted in serious casualties. However, an Israeli military spokesperson immediately issued a stern warning, stating that "the Iranian regime has made a grave mistake," and emphasizing that Israel would continue its military operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Faced with Iran's missile offensive, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is under pressure from both domestic political allies and the opposition to respond forcefully. Despite US President Trump's public warnings to Israel to halt its actions and his claims that he is close to reaching an agreement with Tehran to end the war, Israel has not heeded these warnings. An Israeli official told the media that the Israeli Air Force launched retaliatory airstrikes against multiple military targets in central and western Iran, targeting air defense systems, weapons depots, and missile launch sites. Furthermore, Israeli Ambassador to the US, Yeshir Light, added on social media that other targets also included Iran's non-energy infrastructure.
It is worth noting that Iran had previously issued a clear warning: if Israel retaliates, Iran will launch a stronger counterattack against Israel and its allies. This warning has made the subsequent development of the situation highly uncertain.
US President Trump played a complex and contradictory role in this crisis. On the one hand, in an emergency interview with Fox News and Axios after the attack, he publicly addressed Iran: "You've launched missiles, that's enough. Get back to the negotiating table and make a deal." He also pressured Netanyahu, hoping both sides would compromise. On the other hand, Trump subsequently made a more forceful statement to the Financial Times, claiming he would personally give orders to Netanyahu and determine the terms of the war. He stated bluntly: "It's all up to me. He (Netanyahu) doesn't."
The Trump administration had just announced a ceasefire on a front between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon, on the condition that Hezbollah would not attack Israeli territory and Israel would not strike Beirut. However, Israel's recent airstrikes on the southern outskirts of Beirut (a Hezbollah stronghold) clearly violated this agreement. Although Trump stated in an interview that Israel's recent strikes against Hezbollah targets in Lebanon were not coordinated with the United States, he also expressed support for "surgical" strikes against Hezbollah in another interview, provided that no large-scale attack was launched.
The U.S. Central Command, which oversees U.S. forces in the Middle East, released a video earlier showcasing U.S. fighter jets, with the caption: "U.S. forces across the Middle East remain vigilant and prepared." Previously, the U.S. had deployed aircraft to a base in Israel's Negev Desert and at Tel Aviv Airport, but there is currently no indication that these aircraft have been targeted or involved in combat.
Meanwhile, another direct exchange of fire occurred between Iran and the US military over the weekend. The US military stated that it shot down four Iranian attack drones launched towards the Strait of Hormuz and struck Iranian coastal surveillance and radar sites to weaken Tehran's ability to launch further attacks. The Strait of Hormuz, a strategic waterway through which about one-fifth of the world's seaborne oil relies, has now become one of the central battlegrounds for the conflict. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps claimed that the confrontation was triggered by four oil tankers attempting to pass through the waterway without permission, which the Revolutionary Guard intercepted.
In an Israeli airstrike on the southern outskirts of Beirut, the Lebanese Ministry of Health reported two deaths and twenty injuries, including four women and four children. The Israeli military stated that the strike hit a Hezbollah command center, where the group had previously planned attacks against Israel. Additionally, on Saturday, Israel struck a Lebanese regular army vehicle in southern Lebanon, killing two officers and one soldier. The Israeli military acknowledged the strike, stating that the vehicle was passing through an evacuated active combat zone and the incident is currently under investigation. Despite a long history of conflict between the Israeli and Lebanese armies, they have long played a tacit cooperative role in the fight against Hezbollah.
From Beirut to Tehran, from Yemen to the Strait of Hormuz, a front spanning multiple Middle Eastern hotspots is reigniting. The ceasefire agreement painstakingly brokered by the Trump administration appears fragile in the face of direct military confrontation between Israel and Iran. Schools across Israel have closed, indicating an expectation that hostilities may continue; while Iranian state media, citing military statements, say that if Israel escalates its attacks or responds to Iranian actions, Iran will "first launch a devastating strike against the Israeli regime and its supporters." The international community is holding its breath: will this exchange of fire escalate into a full-blown war? What will the United States choose? Everything remains to be seen in the coming hours and days.
Question 1: Why is this direct clash between Israel and Iran considered a breach of a key red line in the previous ceasefire agreement?
Answer: Since the US-brokered ceasefire agreement took effect in early April 2026, although there have been sporadic small-scale skirmishes between Israel and Hezbollah, which is supported by Iran, both sides have consistently avoided direct attacks on each other's territory. In this conflict, Iran launched multiple waves of missiles into Israel for the first time, while Israel retaliated with airstrikes on military targets in central and western Iran—marking the first time the two countries have directly targeted each other's homeland. This action completely shattered the previous tacit understanding of "proxy war, no direct combat," rendering the ceasefire agreement ineffective.
Question 2: What stance has US President Trump taken in this crisis? Has he supported Israel's actions?
Answer: Trump's stance appears contradictory and wavering. On the one hand, he publicly called on Iran to "return to the negotiating table" while demanding that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu suspend retaliatory actions; on the other hand, he told the Financial Times that "it's all up to me," attempting to personally determine the terms of the war. In concrete actions, Trump supports a "surgical" strike against Hezbollah but opposes a large-scale Israeli attack on Beirut. He also claimed that Israel's recent airstrikes on Beirut were not coordinated with the United States. Overall, Trump wants to maintain the ceasefire he brokered but is unable to completely suppress Israel's need for retaliation.
Question 3: What was the immediate trigger for Iran's attack? What conditions did Tehran put forward?
Answer: The immediate trigger was Israel's airstrike on the southern outskirts of Beirut, the Lebanese capital, which Israel claimed struck Hezbollah's command center. Iran's state broadcaster, citing military statements, said Israel must cease its attacks on southern Lebanon and the Beirut suburbs. Iran had previously sought to include a halt to Israeli military operations in Lebanon as part of peace negotiations with the United States. Iran's chief negotiator, Ghalibaf, even warned that the US blockade of Iranian shipping and its "green light" for the Israeli attack made US and Israeli bases and military assets in the region "legitimate targets."
Question 4: Besides Iran and Israel, what other forces have been involved in this conflict? What roles have they played?
Answer: At least three forces are directly involved. First, Hezbollah in Lebanon, an Iranian-backed militia, launched rockets into northern Israel, prompting an Israeli airstrike on Hezbollah's Beirut headquarters. Second, the Houthi rebels in Yemen, who launched a ballistic missile from Yemen into Israel, which was intercepted by Israeli forces. Third, the US military, which shot down four Iranian attack drones launched towards the Strait of Hormuz and struck Iranian coastal radar sites. The activity of these proxy forces has created a complex, multi-front conflict.
Question 5: Why has the Strait of Hormuz become the focal point of conflict? What potential impact does the confrontation in this region have on global energy supply?
Answer: The Strait of Hormuz is a vital waterway for approximately one-fifth of the world's seaborne oil, holding immense significance for the international energy market. Recently, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps attempted to block the strait, claiming to have intercepted unauthorized oil tankers; the US military, in turn, shot down an Iranian drone and attacked its radar station. If shipping through the strait is disrupted, international oil prices will fluctuate dramatically, potentially severely damaging the global economy. The ongoing small-scale clashes between the US and Iran in these waters have transformed the Strait of Hormuz from a geographical passage into a central arena for strategic competition.
Since the ceasefire agreement took effect, although there have been several low-intensity skirmishes between Iran and Israel, both sides have consistently avoided directly attacking each other's territory. However, this attack and retaliation marks a formal breach of the previously maintained "red line of restraint" between the two countries. According to various sources, the trigger for this round of fighting can be traced back to an Israeli airstrike on Beirut, the capital of Lebanon—the Israeli military claimed it struck a command center of Hezbollah, a Lebanese party supported by Iran. Hezbollah subsequently launched rockets into northern Israel, which were intercepted by the Israeli military, but Iran immediately responded strongly, launching multiple waves of missiles into Israel.
Iran launches missile attacks: several waves of attacks aimed at Israel
Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps publicly claimed responsibility for its missile strikes on an airbase in southern Israel. Simultaneously, air raid sirens sounded across Israel, and the military confirmed that Iran had launched multiple waves of new missiles. Further complicating matters, Israel also intercepted a ballistic missile launched from Yemen, believed to have been fired by the Houthi rebels—an Iranian-backed group that controls much of Yemen and is designated a terrorist organization by the United States.
U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee described the tense scene on social media: Explosions could be clearly heard over Tel Aviv as Israel scrambled to intercept incoming missiles. Fortunately, neither the attack from Yemen nor the initial Iranian strikes resulted in serious casualties. However, an Israeli military spokesperson immediately issued a stern warning, stating that "the Iranian regime has made a grave mistake," and emphasizing that Israel would continue its military operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon.
Israel retaliates decisively: airstrikes target military targets deep within Iran.
Faced with Iran's missile offensive, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is under pressure from both domestic political allies and the opposition to respond forcefully. Despite US President Trump's public warnings to Israel to halt its actions and his claims that he is close to reaching an agreement with Tehran to end the war, Israel has not heeded these warnings. An Israeli official told the media that the Israeli Air Force launched retaliatory airstrikes against multiple military targets in central and western Iran, targeting air defense systems, weapons depots, and missile launch sites. Furthermore, Israeli Ambassador to the US, Yeshir Light, added on social media that other targets also included Iran's non-energy infrastructure.
It is worth noting that Iran had previously issued a clear warning: if Israel retaliates, Iran will launch a stronger counterattack against Israel and its allies. This warning has made the subsequent development of the situation highly uncertain.
Trump's Dilemma: His attempts to mediate failed, so he issued orders.
US President Trump played a complex and contradictory role in this crisis. On the one hand, in an emergency interview with Fox News and Axios after the attack, he publicly addressed Iran: "You've launched missiles, that's enough. Get back to the negotiating table and make a deal." He also pressured Netanyahu, hoping both sides would compromise. On the other hand, Trump subsequently made a more forceful statement to the Financial Times, claiming he would personally give orders to Netanyahu and determine the terms of the war. He stated bluntly: "It's all up to me. He (Netanyahu) doesn't."
The Trump administration had just announced a ceasefire on a front between Israel and Hezbollah in Lebanon, on the condition that Hezbollah would not attack Israeli territory and Israel would not strike Beirut. However, Israel's recent airstrikes on the southern outskirts of Beirut (a Hezbollah stronghold) clearly violated this agreement. Although Trump stated in an interview that Israel's recent strikes against Hezbollah targets in Lebanon were not coordinated with the United States, he also expressed support for "surgical" strikes against Hezbollah in another interview, provided that no large-scale attack was launched.
US military vigilance and the undercurrents in the Strait of Hormuz
The U.S. Central Command, which oversees U.S. forces in the Middle East, released a video earlier showcasing U.S. fighter jets, with the caption: "U.S. forces across the Middle East remain vigilant and prepared." Previously, the U.S. had deployed aircraft to a base in Israel's Negev Desert and at Tel Aviv Airport, but there is currently no indication that these aircraft have been targeted or involved in combat.
Meanwhile, another direct exchange of fire occurred between Iran and the US military over the weekend. The US military stated that it shot down four Iranian attack drones launched towards the Strait of Hormuz and struck Iranian coastal surveillance and radar sites to weaken Tehran's ability to launch further attacks. The Strait of Hormuz, a strategic waterway through which about one-fifth of the world's seaborne oil relies, has now become one of the central battlegrounds for the conflict. Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps claimed that the confrontation was triggered by four oil tankers attempting to pass through the waterway without permission, which the Revolutionary Guard intercepted.
The chain reaction on the Lebanese front: Hezbollah and the Lebanese army both suffer losses.
In an Israeli airstrike on the southern outskirts of Beirut, the Lebanese Ministry of Health reported two deaths and twenty injuries, including four women and four children. The Israeli military stated that the strike hit a Hezbollah command center, where the group had previously planned attacks against Israel. Additionally, on Saturday, Israel struck a Lebanese regular army vehicle in southern Lebanon, killing two officers and one soldier. The Israeli military acknowledged the strike, stating that the vehicle was passing through an evacuated active combat zone and the incident is currently under investigation. Despite a long history of conflict between the Israeli and Lebanese armies, they have long played a tacit cooperative role in the fight against Hezbollah.
In conclusion, the ceasefire agreement is ineffective, and the risk of a full-scale war remains high.
From Beirut to Tehran, from Yemen to the Strait of Hormuz, a front spanning multiple Middle Eastern hotspots is reigniting. The ceasefire agreement painstakingly brokered by the Trump administration appears fragile in the face of direct military confrontation between Israel and Iran. Schools across Israel have closed, indicating an expectation that hostilities may continue; while Iranian state media, citing military statements, say that if Israel escalates its attacks or responds to Iranian actions, Iran will "first launch a devastating strike against the Israeli regime and its supporters." The international community is holding its breath: will this exchange of fire escalate into a full-blown war? What will the United States choose? Everything remains to be seen in the coming hours and days.
Frequently Asked Questions
Question 1: Why is this direct clash between Israel and Iran considered a breach of a key red line in the previous ceasefire agreement?
Answer: Since the US-brokered ceasefire agreement took effect in early April 2026, although there have been sporadic small-scale skirmishes between Israel and Hezbollah, which is supported by Iran, both sides have consistently avoided direct attacks on each other's territory. In this conflict, Iran launched multiple waves of missiles into Israel for the first time, while Israel retaliated with airstrikes on military targets in central and western Iran—marking the first time the two countries have directly targeted each other's homeland. This action completely shattered the previous tacit understanding of "proxy war, no direct combat," rendering the ceasefire agreement ineffective.
Question 2: What stance has US President Trump taken in this crisis? Has he supported Israel's actions?
Answer: Trump's stance appears contradictory and wavering. On the one hand, he publicly called on Iran to "return to the negotiating table" while demanding that Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu suspend retaliatory actions; on the other hand, he told the Financial Times that "it's all up to me," attempting to personally determine the terms of the war. In concrete actions, Trump supports a "surgical" strike against Hezbollah but opposes a large-scale Israeli attack on Beirut. He also claimed that Israel's recent airstrikes on Beirut were not coordinated with the United States. Overall, Trump wants to maintain the ceasefire he brokered but is unable to completely suppress Israel's need for retaliation.
Question 3: What was the immediate trigger for Iran's attack? What conditions did Tehran put forward?
Answer: The immediate trigger was Israel's airstrike on the southern outskirts of Beirut, the Lebanese capital, which Israel claimed struck Hezbollah's command center. Iran's state broadcaster, citing military statements, said Israel must cease its attacks on southern Lebanon and the Beirut suburbs. Iran had previously sought to include a halt to Israeli military operations in Lebanon as part of peace negotiations with the United States. Iran's chief negotiator, Ghalibaf, even warned that the US blockade of Iranian shipping and its "green light" for the Israeli attack made US and Israeli bases and military assets in the region "legitimate targets."
Question 4: Besides Iran and Israel, what other forces have been involved in this conflict? What roles have they played?
Answer: At least three forces are directly involved. First, Hezbollah in Lebanon, an Iranian-backed militia, launched rockets into northern Israel, prompting an Israeli airstrike on Hezbollah's Beirut headquarters. Second, the Houthi rebels in Yemen, who launched a ballistic missile from Yemen into Israel, which was intercepted by Israeli forces. Third, the US military, which shot down four Iranian attack drones launched towards the Strait of Hormuz and struck Iranian coastal radar sites. The activity of these proxy forces has created a complex, multi-front conflict.
Question 5: Why has the Strait of Hormuz become the focal point of conflict? What potential impact does the confrontation in this region have on global energy supply?
Answer: The Strait of Hormuz is a vital waterway for approximately one-fifth of the world's seaborne oil, holding immense significance for the international energy market. Recently, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps attempted to block the strait, claiming to have intercepted unauthorized oil tankers; the US military, in turn, shot down an Iranian drone and attacked its radar station. If shipping through the strait is disrupted, international oil prices will fluctuate dramatically, potentially severely damaging the global economy. The ongoing small-scale clashes between the US and Iran in these waters have transformed the Strait of Hormuz from a geographical passage into a central arena for strategic competition.
- Risk Warning and Disclaimer
- The market involves risk, and trading may not be suitable for all investors. This article is for reference only and does not constitute personal investment advice, nor does it take into account certain users’ specific investment objectives, financial situation, or other needs. Any investment decisions made based on this information are at your own risk.
