The US Treasury tripled its share buyback program to $6 billion, but the 10-year yield remained steady at 4.85%. Why is the market not buying it?
2026-09-10 14:20:09

The U.S. Treasury is increasing its bond buyback program.
The U.S. Treasury announced on Wednesday (September 9) that it would repurchase up to $6 billion of 10- to 20-year government bonds, three times the previous $2 billion. On the surface, this should support bonds—theoretically, the Treasury buying old securities and removing them from the market helps improve liquidity, while creating demand and lowering yields. However, the reality is quite the opposite: the 10-year Treasury yield remains around 4.85%, the highest level since 2023. Where did things go wrong?Expectations vs. Reality: Why did $6 billion fail to lower yields?
This is a classic example of the gap between expectations and reality. The problem is that the market had already anticipated the Treasury's increased力度 (intensity/effort). Bessant had stated last month that it would increase the scale of long-term liquidity support repurchases from $2 billion to at least $4 billion. Therefore, while $6 billion is indeed larger than the previously signaled amount, traders, based on its communications and subsequent hawkish statements, had been expecting a scale closer to $8 billion to $10 billion. Furthermore, the latest announcement did not make any clearer commitment to a significant expansion of intervention in the future. In short, this is not the "shocking" scale that some bond market participants had hoped for. This is crucial because the Treasury is currently facing much larger macroeconomic forces: oil prices hitting $100/barrel, raising inflation risks again; a still large fiscal deficit; and still substantial government borrowing needs. All these factors continue to drive investors to demand higher yields to hold long-term debt.What does repurchase agreement mean for Treasury bond yields?
The potential of repurchase operations to improve liquidity and provide some technical support for long-duration Treasury bonds should not be underestimated. However, $6 billion is a drop in the ocean compared to the size of the entire Treasury market and cannot fundamentally eliminate inflation or fiscal risks. This makes repurchase operations noteworthy, but should not be seen as a major turning point for yields. The market reaction reinforces a larger, more significant message from the bond market: in the current market and economic environment, investors still demand higher yields—that is, holding long-term government debt requires greater compensation. Until this pattern changes, Treasury repurchases may only help alleviate pressure, but are unlikely to reverse the broader structural shift.Editor's Summary
The US Treasury expanded its long-term repurchase program to $6 billion, reflecting its policy intention to stabilize market liquidity, but failed to reverse the rise in the 10-year yield to around 4.85%. Market reactions indicate that technical intervention is insufficient to counteract macroeconomic forces such as rising oil prices, fiscal supply pressures, and inflation concerns. Until there is a significant shift in structural factors, the high level of long-term yields is likely to continue, with repurchase agreements playing a more buffering rather than a leading role.Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Why is the U.S. Treasury expanding its Treasury bond repurchase program? A: The main purpose is to improve market liquidity for long-term Treasury bonds. As bond issuance times lengthen, trading activity in some older bonds decreases, bid-ask spreads widen, and institutional holdings decline. By periodically repurchasing these less liquid securities, the Treasury can improve market efficiency, help investors adjust their positions more smoothly, and indirectly support the successful completion of new bond auctions. Bessant has repeatedly emphasized that this move is not quantitative easing, nor is it a direct attempt to lower yields, but rather to maintain market order and prevent a rapid rise in yields that could trigger a negative cycle. Q: Why did the $6 billion repurchase program fail to lower the 10-year yield? A: The market had already fully anticipated the previous communications, and some dealers even expected a larger scale. While the actual $6 billion repurchase amount is a recent high, it did not create an "unexpected shock." Furthermore, the repurchase amount is relatively small compared to the overall size of the Treasury bond market, making it difficult to have a decisive impact on the overall supply and demand dynamics. More importantly, concerns about inflation stemming from high oil prices, a massive fiscal deficit, and persistent government borrowing needs have collectively driven up investors' demands for risk compensation. The power of these macroeconomic factors far outweighs any single technical maneuver. Q: What is the current level of the 10-year US Treasury yield? What is its significance? A: After the announcement, the yield rose to around 4.85%, the highest level since 2023. This level signifies a significant increase in government financing costs and will have a broad impact on stock market valuations, corporate borrowing costs, and global asset pricing. High yields typically reflect market concerns about inflation stickiness or fiscal sustainability, and may also attract more funds into the US Treasury market. If high levels persist, it will further test the policy response space. Q: What is the relationship between oil prices and long-term yields? A: Rising oil prices directly push up energy costs, thereby reinforcing inflation expectations. When the market expects inflation to be more persistent, investors will demand higher nominal yields to compensate for the loss of real purchasing power, especially for long-term bonds. The recent surge in international oil prices, approaching or reaching $100 per barrel, has been a significant catalyst for rising yields, making the Treasury's repurchase efforts face greater resistance. Q: Will Treasury bond repurchases expand further in the future? Can they truly reverse the yield trend? A: The Treasury has stated that subsequent operations will remain at least $4 billion, with the specific scale adjusted according to market conditions. Further expansion is possible, but the effectiveness still depends on changes in the macroeconomic environment. If inflationary pressures ease and the fiscal path becomes more sustainable, the technical support for repurchases may be more effective; conversely, if supply pressures and inflation concerns persist, repurchases will only slow the upward trend and are unlikely to fundamentally reverse investors' demands for higher compensation. Ultimately, the market is still driven by fundamentals.- Risk Warning and Disclaimer
- The market involves risk, and trading may not be suitable for all investors. This article is for reference only and does not constitute personal investment advice, nor does it take into account certain users’ specific investment objectives, financial situation, or other needs. Any investment decisions made based on this information are at your own risk.