Preview of the Trump-Putin Meeting: Key Demands and Impact on Oil Prices and the Euro
2025-08-15 16:14:28
Trump and Putin will meet in Alaska on August 15th, with global attention focused on their negotiations over nuclear arms control and the Ukraine issue. This meeting will not only impact the strategic balance between the US and Russia, but its outcomes are also likely to have a significant impact on oil prices and the euro exchange rate through channels such as energy patterns and geopolitical risks.
The New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) expires in February of next year, and nuclear arms control will be a core topic of the talks. If the US and Russia reach a consensus on nuclear arms control, the market will view it as a clear signal of de-escalation in strategic confrontation between major powers, leading to a rapid decline in geopolitical risk premiums and a potential short-term drop in oil prices of $2-4 per barrel. This decline will be exacerbated by a weakening US dollar and a rebound in risk appetite. Conversely, if the talks fail, market concerns about a new arms race and a deteriorating security situation in the Middle East and Europe could lead to a further increase in the Brent risk premium by $3-5 per barrel and a surge in the volatility index. Combined with the summer demand surge, oil prices could easily surge to the upper end of their yearly range.
The two sides may seek "soft solutions" in many areas, with clear demands hidden behind them. Trump may push for "targeted relaxation" of US and Western sanctions on Russia (such as some energy and agricultural product trade) in exchange for Russia's openness to US capital in Ukraine's food exports and reconstruction; Russia hopes to restore foreign exchange earnings from energy and resource exports and stabilize the domestic economy through easing sanctions.
Trump may ask Russia to reduce its low-priced gas supply to Europe to make room for US LNG exports and consolidate the dollar's dominance in energy settlements.
Russia, on the other hand, needs to ensure the stability of gas supplies to Europe through Ukraine while increasing the proportion of non-dollar settlements to mitigate exchange rate risks. Trump may seek Russia's tacit approval of Ukraine's "Westernization" process to maintain US geopolitical influence in Eastern Europe. Russia, on the other hand, is focused on preventing NATO's eastward expansion, affirming the special status of eastern Ukraine, and building a security barrier around it.
In terms of energy supply stability, the issue of Ukrainian natural gas transit is key: if the United States and Russia fail to reach an agreement, Europe's energy gap will continue, and the soaring natural gas prices will push up demand for oil alternatives and support oil prices; if Russia commits to maintaining stable gas supply to Europe, the premium space for U.S. LNG exports will narrow, and the upward pressure on oil prices may ease.
Regarding geopolitical risks, if the Russia-Ukraine tensions ease due to the talks, market concerns about supply disruptions could lead to a correction in oil prices. However, if the talks break down, expectations of an escalation of conflict could trigger a speculative rally in oil prices. Furthermore, if Trump pushes for a joint US-Russia effort to influence OPEC+ production cuts, this could push up oil prices.
In terms of improved energy costs, as the Eurozone is a net energy importer, every 10% drop in natural gas prices can reduce import costs by 20 billion euros, driving the expansion of the current account surplus; the decline in energy prices eases inflationary pressure, provides room for the ECB to cut interest rates, and may attract capital inflows into euro assets, supporting the euro exchange rate.
In terms of geopolitical risks, if the situation between Russia and Ukraine cools down, safe-haven funds may shift from the US dollar and Swiss franc to the euro, replicating the trend of the euro breaking through 1.16 against the US dollar after the Middle East ceasefire in June 2025; if Europe maintains high defense spending, it may stimulate industrial investment and employment, which will work together with the decline in energy costs to further push up the euro.
The ECB may use verbal intervention to curb the excessive appreciation of the euro and balance export competitiveness with inflation targets; if the Trump administration imposes tariffs on the EU, eurozone exports will be hit, which may offset the positive energy effects and suppress the euro's trend.
The core of this meeting is the US-Russia struggle over energy interests and geopolitical security. Oil prices will depend in the short term on the dynamics of Ukraine's energy corridor, while in the medium and long term, US and Russian influence on OPEC+ will be crucial. The euro, however, will be supported by falling energy costs and geopolitical easing, but caution should be exercised regarding trade frictions between the US and China and ECB policy intervention. Investors should closely monitor whether the two sides reach a consensus on Ukrainian natural gas transit and joint energy supply regulation, as these signals could signal market turning points.
The New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (New START) expires in February of next year, and nuclear arms control will be a core topic of the talks. If the US and Russia reach a consensus on nuclear arms control, the market will view it as a clear signal of de-escalation in strategic confrontation between major powers, leading to a rapid decline in geopolitical risk premiums and a potential short-term drop in oil prices of $2-4 per barrel. This decline will be exacerbated by a weakening US dollar and a rebound in risk appetite. Conversely, if the talks fail, market concerns about a new arms race and a deteriorating security situation in the Middle East and Europe could lead to a further increase in the Brent risk premium by $3-5 per barrel and a surge in the volatility index. Combined with the summer demand surge, oil prices could easily surge to the upper end of their yearly range.
Ukraine issue
The two sides may seek "soft solutions" in many areas, with clear demands hidden behind them. Trump may push for "targeted relaxation" of US and Western sanctions on Russia (such as some energy and agricultural product trade) in exchange for Russia's openness to US capital in Ukraine's food exports and reconstruction; Russia hopes to restore foreign exchange earnings from energy and resource exports and stabilize the domestic economy through easing sanctions.
Trump may ask Russia to reduce its low-priced gas supply to Europe to make room for US LNG exports and consolidate the dollar's dominance in energy settlements.
Russia, on the other hand, needs to ensure the stability of gas supplies to Europe through Ukraine while increasing the proportion of non-dollar settlements to mitigate exchange rate risks. Trump may seek Russia's tacit approval of Ukraine's "Westernization" process to maintain US geopolitical influence in Eastern Europe. Russia, on the other hand, is focused on preventing NATO's eastward expansion, affirming the special status of eastern Ukraine, and building a security barrier around it.
Impact on oil prices: Energy game dominates the trend
In terms of energy supply stability, the issue of Ukrainian natural gas transit is key: if the United States and Russia fail to reach an agreement, Europe's energy gap will continue, and the soaring natural gas prices will push up demand for oil alternatives and support oil prices; if Russia commits to maintaining stable gas supply to Europe, the premium space for U.S. LNG exports will narrow, and the upward pressure on oil prices may ease.
Regarding geopolitical risks, if the Russia-Ukraine tensions ease due to the talks, market concerns about supply disruptions could lead to a correction in oil prices. However, if the talks break down, expectations of an escalation of conflict could trigger a speculative rally in oil prices. Furthermore, if Trump pushes for a joint US-Russia effort to influence OPEC+ production cuts, this could push up oil prices.
Impact on the Euro Exchange Rate: Dual Driven by Energy Costs and Capital Flows
In terms of improved energy costs, as the Eurozone is a net energy importer, every 10% drop in natural gas prices can reduce import costs by 20 billion euros, driving the expansion of the current account surplus; the decline in energy prices eases inflationary pressure, provides room for the ECB to cut interest rates, and may attract capital inflows into euro assets, supporting the euro exchange rate.
In terms of geopolitical risks, if the situation between Russia and Ukraine cools down, safe-haven funds may shift from the US dollar and Swiss franc to the euro, replicating the trend of the euro breaking through 1.16 against the US dollar after the Middle East ceasefire in June 2025; if Europe maintains high defense spending, it may stimulate industrial investment and employment, which will work together with the decline in energy costs to further push up the euro.
The ECB may use verbal intervention to curb the excessive appreciation of the euro and balance export competitiveness with inflation targets; if the Trump administration imposes tariffs on the EU, eurozone exports will be hit, which may offset the positive energy effects and suppress the euro's trend.
The core of this meeting is the US-Russia struggle over energy interests and geopolitical security. Oil prices will depend in the short term on the dynamics of Ukraine's energy corridor, while in the medium and long term, US and Russian influence on OPEC+ will be crucial. The euro, however, will be supported by falling energy costs and geopolitical easing, but caution should be exercised regarding trade frictions between the US and China and ECB policy intervention. Investors should closely monitor whether the two sides reach a consensus on Ukrainian natural gas transit and joint energy supply regulation, as these signals could signal market turning points.
- Risk Warning and Disclaimer
- The market involves risk, and trading may not be suitable for all investors. This article is for reference only and does not constitute personal investment advice, nor does it take into account certain users’ specific investment objectives, financial situation, or other needs. Any investment decisions made based on this information are at your own risk.
